Annex E - Drop in sessions summary
|
Date |
Location |
Number of participants |
Issues raised/Questions asked |
Key concerns |
|
Thursday, 02 April 2026 |
St Nicholas Church, Dunnington |
7
|
· Costing of the project, how it will be funded, and the time needed for repayment. · Storage issues. · Smaller households do not need larger bins for the amount they recycle.
|
· Lack of storage space - This is the most consistent concern, particularly in terraced properties, where residents feel there is insufficient room for additional bins. · Visual impact (aesthetics) - Many residents feel that multiple bins at the front of properties are unsightly and negatively affect the appearance of streets. · Bin size and suitability - Concerns that bins are too large for smaller households, elderly residents, or those who do not generate much recycling. There is demand for smaller or flexible bin size options. · Desire for flexibility and choice - Residents want options such as: Ø Opting out of the scheme Ø Sharing bins with neighbours Ø Communal bins Ø Split bins for multiple waste streams · Safety concerns - Including potential fire risks (particularly from paper/card bins) and vermin (e.g. rats accessing bins). · Collection frequency and service design - Some residents feel proposed collection schedule will be insufficient and would prefer more frequent collections and/or different bin capacities. · Cost and funding transparency - Questions about how the project will be funded and the cost implications for residents. · Practical/operational concerns - Including obstruction of pavements, where bins can be stored (e.g. on pavements), and general confusion about recycling rules. · Enforcement concerns - Questions around whether residents will be fined for not recycling.
|
|
Thursday, 09 April 2026 |
Village Hall, Bishopthorpe |
1 |
· Will there be an option to opt out?
|
|
|
Monday, 13 April 2026 |
Explore Library, Clifton |
10 |
· The aesthetics of four bins are unsightly. · There are issues with space for four bins. · Concerns regarding terraced streets and the future timeline of Phase 2. · The frequency of collections is inadequate – would prefer 180L bins collected every fortnight. · Different bin size options are needed – especially for elderly or single people who may take longer to fill recycling. · Concerns about the fire hazard posed by the 240L paper and card bin. · Concerns about rats accessing the recycling bins.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 14 April 2026 |
Online |
9 |
· Limited storage in terraced houses. · Fire hazards from combustible materials in bins. · Obstruction of pedestrians. · General service queries regarding recyclable materials.
|
|
|
Monday, 20 April 2026 |
St Barnabas Church, Holgate |
11 |
· Storage in terraced areas is a huge issue. · Smaller bins are preferred, or residents would like to have their say on the size. · Can neighbours share bins? · There should be an opt-out option. · The survey is not clear regarding bin sizes and no option to indicate a smaller bin will be sufficient. · Residents that are happy with the bins, can they store them on the pavement? · Is there an option to have only one bin for plastics if paper is composted?
|
|
|
Friday 24 April 2024 |
Door 84 Community Centre, The Groves |
2 |
· The option of communal bins for residents with limited space. · Concerns that storage space is at a premium, and bins kept at the front of properties are unsightly, particularly on terraced streets. · What will happen if residents refuse to recycle – will fines be issued? · Interest in having the option to share bins with neighbours. · A request for a single bin divided into two sections for different waste streams.
|
Table 12 – Summary of drop-in sessions